Martha's Ramblings

A hoax can get started with maybe a grain of truth.

I recently received an email about a dog leading so many folks to safety during the attack of 9/11. It was very well done, with a picture of the heroic dog included. The Hoax.

It was a stirring story, except it wasn’t true. I usually check to see if stories are really true, but since this wasn’t of the murdering madmen variety or any one of the type I usually get, I didn’t check it out.  When someone brought my attention to the fact that it was a hoax, it burned me up.  There were clues in the original email that if I had checked, I would have known something was not kosher.

The email said the dog led some of those folks from the 112nd floor.  But how many people actually know that each tower had 110 floors? I didn’t!

I should have known that if this story was really true, it would surely have been televised at least once!

Now I wonder if this hoax was based on another story (which may or may not be true) about a guide dog on 9/11. Guide Dog Led Owner Down Stairs on 9/11

The reference to this story (Excerpted from Ventura County Star, April 25, 2003) does not seem to be availble.  At least I didn’t find it.

So maybe, since this article is to ‘persuade people to raise guide puppies’, the elaborate hoax about Daisy may have been done in order to get more people to raise guide puppies.  Unfortunately in this cas the untruth may have had the effect of making folks mad instead of getting the attention the hoaxer wanted.

Of course there is always the possiblility that someone just wants to ‘be funny’ and see how far the hoax will spread.

Martha

I am wondering if Sony has managed to really tick off someone.  Either that or maybe they need to shell out some $$$ for really good security.

Just read the log of Sony’s problems on this site, Sony’s hacking woes mount after PSN breach.

Maybe North Korean students are practicing?  North Korea’s Overseas Cyber Warrior Training.

Wouldn’t want to be a Sony IT person right now.

Martha

Several times I have seen posts on Facebook from folks who say “I Didn’t Post That, please ignore it”.

‘That’ is something malicious and I am wondering how ‘that’ managed to get posted from the user’s account!

One thing could be the user has a weak password for Facebook.  But the users that posted “I didn’t post that” are fairly computer savvy and should have used good passwords.

Now we are finding out that third party apps (like Farmville) are probably the culprits although they are probably not aware of the security issue.

Net-Security explains.

Egads, what next Facebook?

Martha

Some time back I wrote a post about ‘Firefox cannot find the server‘.

I had to go back to Firefox as it just has too much going for it the other browsers don’t.  But I do use Opera and Chrome, rarely Internet Explorer (that ActiveX thing is still there) and rarely still, Safari.

Imagine my surprise when Google Chrome couldn’t find Google!

Martha

I have a contact form on my website.

I was getting responses from so many folks trying to sell me SEO services I decided to add this line to the page:

“If you are trying to sell me an SEO service, don’t bother, I won’t reply!”

Since I am still getting requests to sell me SEO, I guess there is a bot looking for contact forms.

Since the form is completely filled out, is this an automated response? (How do they do that?) Or do these SEO folks just don’t or can’t read?

Martha

Much has been said about Facebook’s privacy or lack thereof, but Facebook isn’t the only place that wants all of your personal details.

I subscribe to a number of RSS feed and some of them are about security.

One of the these feeds is offering a free ‘unofficial guide to Facebook privacy‘.

To get the guide all you have to do is fill out a form.

Facebook only requires your name, age and a valid email address.

Although your birth date is not required, looks like they want a lot of information just to get a Facebook privacy guide!

What a sneaky way to get your employment details! And what will they do with all that information if a user provides it?

Martha

Today I discovered something in Gmail that surely has me worried.

I use two Gmail accounts, one for personal stuff and the other for business related stuff. This has really worked just fine for the most part (except when I signed up for Coke Rewards and the spam gate opened!)

Generally Gmail handles the spam just fine.  I do look in the spam folder as occasionally a legitimate email goes to the spam filter, but not often.

But today something odd happened.  I have been having a problem with other websites hot-linking to my images so I have decided to ‘watermark’ all my images.  I am not really graphics inclined and all of the watermark files I have made are ok for some, but not for others.  So I have searched for a program that will do the trick for me and I found one reasonably priced so I bought it.

I of course had to provide an email address and I used the Gmail address I use for business.

I kept waiting for the confirmation email from the site, but it didn’t show up.  Don’t know why I decided to look in the Trash folder, but I did and there was the email I waited for.  In the Trash! I did NOT delete it!  In fact there were three emails from the vendor.  I could understand if I had found them in the Spam folder, but the Trash?

So now I am getting concerned about Gmail and I guess I will have to search the trash from now on. Hopefully this was a temporary blip, but now I feel I can’t trust Gmail.

Martha

I keep getting an email from various friends and family about October having 5 Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays. (This is true.) Then the email goes on to say “This happens once every 823 years.”  (Definitely NOT true!)

How can folks be so gullible!

Well if enough people say something, then folks start to believe it however ridiculous it may be. This is true of a lot of the junk emails getting sent around in cyberspace.

There are a number of sites that have taken the time to debunk (explain) the truth about this hoax. One is the Hoax Slayer and another is Snopes.

If people would just stop to think they might realize that some things just aren’t realistic, common sense should tell us it wouldn’t happen only every 823 years!

Martha

Some ‘free’ things are not free.  If you have to provide your personal detail in order to receive information, it isn’t free.  Companies pay big bucks for user details, so many sites try to collect them.  That’s why there are so many social networking sites.  They don’t charge you a fee, but you pay with your details.

I am a fanatic about Facebook privacy.  So when I saw this ‘free’ offer for “The (Very) Unoficial Guide to Facebook Privacy Free Guide“, I bit.

But it isn’t free.  In order to get this guide I have to provide a LOT of personal information.
“Complete and verifiable information is required in order to receive this Guide.”

I suspect the guide would tell me not to provide this kind of information to Facebook, but I think I’ll just pass on this ‘Free Guide’.

Can you say ‘Hypocrite’?

Martha

So why is that?  It’s because of all those external ad servers!  More all the time.  Sometimes there are so many ads on a site it’s hard to find any content.

I know folks need to pay the bills, but give me a break, enough already! First there is intelli-text with those irritating boxes that jump up and obscure what you want to see. It’s not just personal sites either. Even CNN uses intelli-text!

I read a lot of stuff online, but sometimes it gets frustrating when I have to wait for all those ad servers to finish loading.

Just a few that I have waited for today:
Downloading data from apimg.video.ap.org
Downloading data from core.videoegg.com
Downloading data from cdn.eyewonder.com
Downloading data from s0.2mdn.net
Downloading data from puma.vizu.com
Downloading data from ads.yldmgrimg.net

There were more, but they loaded so fast I couldn’t read them all.

Today I am waiting and waiting………Trying to view Environmental Graffiti! The bar at the bottom of my browser says ‘Waiting for dig.com’.  Why? I have no idea!
Now it says Transferring data from scribol.com…’ Waiting for zulu.tweetmeme.com… I just don’t have time for all this ‘Waiting for’, so I will pass on this today and just mark those feeds as read. maybe I will try again later, but probably not.

Martha